0.0/5 rating (0 votes)

ON ETHNOLINGUISTIC FEATURES OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH COMPONENTS EXPRESSING NAMES OF ANIMALS IN SHUGHNANIAN-ROSHANIAN GROUP OF PAMIR LANGUAGES

Avtors

Mirzoshoev S.

Abstract

The article dwells on the new materials of Shughnanian-Rushanian group of Pamir languages reflecting the peculiar culture wealth as the base of national consciousness distinguishing them from the other languages. Into the bargain, the given article discloses language peculiarities of PhUs and functions of their patterns.It is underscored that phraseological units with zoomynic components participate actively in forming figurative system entering into the world language as a component. The use of phraseological units with zoonymic components occupies a special place in phraseological systems of different languages. Features of phraseological units testify to the national originality of social behavior of the bearer of this language. Phraseological units containing these components convey material and spiritual culture and compile, transmit it in language from generation to generation. The author considers variants and semantics of the use of phraseological units with zoonymic components based on the material of Shughnanian-Rushanian group of Pamir languages since phraseologies clearly reflect national-cultural specifics of the world languages permitting to talk about connotative features and values of the peoples of Pamir. Special attention is paid to classification of these phraseologies.

Keywords

Shughnanian-Rushanian group of Pamir languages, phraseological units, zoonimy, language pecularities, cultural values, picture of the world, material and spiritual culture, national-cultural particularity of worldpicture, classification of phraseology

References

  1. 1.         Aliferenko N.F. Linguoculturology: Value-Sensible Space of Language: study guide / N.F. Aliferenko. - M.: Flinta: Science 2010, - 399 pp.
  2. 2.         Alifrenko, N.F., Semeninko N.N. Phraseology and Paremiology: a textbook for bachelor's level of philological education / N.F. Aliferenko, N.N. Semeninko. - M.: Flint: Science, 2009. – 344 pp.
  3. 3.         Bagan, J., Mikhailova Yu.S. Faunonemic Vocabulary in the Language System and its National-Cultural Specificity (based on the lexical units "horse", "horse", "pig" in Russian, English and German languages) / J. Bagana, Yu.S. Mikhailova // Scientific Bulletin of BelSU, Series of Humanitarian Sciences. - Belgorod, 2011. - No. 24 (119). Issue 12.
  4. 4.         Bally, C. French stylistics 2nd ed., Stereotyped. - M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. – 392 pp.
  5. 5.         Vorobyov V.V. Linguoculturelogy: a tutorial. Moscow: RUPF Publishing-House, 2006. - 330 pp.
  6. 6.         Humboldt V. Selected Works on Linguistics / V. Humboldt. – M.: Progress, 1984. - 397 pp.
  7. 7.         Maslova, V.A. Linguoculturolagy: textbook for students of higher education. textbook, institutions / V.A. Maslova. - Publishing center "Academy", 2001. - 208 pp.
  8. 8.         Sapir, E. Selected Works on Linguistics and Cultural Studies / E. Sapir. - M.: Progress, 1993. - 656 pp.
  9. 9.         Telia, V.N. Russian Phraseology. Semantic, Pragmatic and Linguoculturological Aspects / V.N. Telia. - M.: School Languages of Russian Culture, 1996. - 288 pp.

Publication date

Wednesday, 12 January 2022